Turkey’s Geopolitical Role in Central Asia: Geopolitical Interests and Strategies for Enhancing Influence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJLRS.2026.v5n8p8Keywords:
Turkey, Central Asia, Geopolitics, Foreign Policy, Influence, Middle Corridor, Balance of Power, Energy, International RelationsAbstract
This study aimed to shed on Turkey's geopolitical role in Central Asia: geopolitical interests and Strategies for Enhancing Influence, by analyzing the transformations that have taken place in Turkish foreign policy toward the region since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the resulting restructuring of the geopolitical environment in the Eurasian space. The study is based on the hypothesis that the growing geopolitical and economic importance of Central Asia has encouraged Turkey to adopt a more active and multidimensional foreign policy, aimed at advancing its strategic interests and expanding its regional influence, while capitalizing on its historical, linguistic, and cultural ties with the Central Asian republics, as well as its strategic geographical position linking Asia and Europe.
The study focuses on analyzing the main determinants of Turkish interests in Central Asia, particularly the historical, cultural, and identity-related determinants, as well as geopolitical, economic, and energy-related factors. It also analyzes the strategies and instruments employed by Ankara to strengthen its presence and influence in the region. In this context, the Middle Corridor emerges as one of the most important instruments of Turkey’s geopolitical repositioning, as it provides opportunities to enhance trade and transportation connectivity between China, Central Asia, the Caucasus, and Europe, diversify trade and transportation routes, and reduce relative dependence on routes passing through Russian or Iranian territory. The study also examines Turkey’s utilization of its geographical position within energy corridors, particularly oil and gas pipelines, with the aim of strengthening its role as a regional energy hub and maximizing the geopolitical value of its strategic location.
The study further examines Turkey’s soft-power instruments through cultural, educational, and institutional cooperation, particularly through the Organization of Turkic States, alongside the growing economic, investment, military, and defense cooperation with the Central Asian states. It demonstrates that Turkish policy has undergone a significant transformation from greater reliance on cultural and identity-based ties toward adopting a multidimensional approach that combines geopolitical instruments, economic power, soft power, and hard power, reflecting the expanding scope of Turkish foreign-policy instruments and the diversification of its engagement in the region.
The study concludes that Turkey seeks, through its growing engagement in Central Asia, to strengthen its position as an influential regional power in the Eurasian space and to transform its geographical position and historical and cultural ties into sources of power and influence. The study also demonstrates that the Middle Corridor, energy corridors, and economic, cultural, and military cooperation have become among the most important instruments employed by Ankara to enhance its geopolitical presence. However, Turkey’s ability to achieve sustainable influence remains dependent on its capacity to manage its relations with the major actors in the region, particularly Russia, China, Iran, and the United States, amid a regional and international environment characterized by shifting balances of power and intensifying competition over trade routes, energy, and spheres of influence. Accordingly, Turkey’s role in Central Asia does not primarily represent an attempt to completely replace the influence of other powers, but rather reflects an effort to establish a flexible and multidimensional sphere of influence that strengthens Turkey’s position as a regional power and a strategic bridge between East and West.
References
المراجع العربية:
1. احمد داوود اوغلو - ترجمة محمد جابر وطارق ثلجي، 2010، العمق الاستراتيجي موقع تركيا ودورها في الساحة الدولية، الدوحة، مركز الجزيرة للدراسات - الدار العربية للعلوم ناشرون.
2. حليم قيبوب، 2024، الامن الجيوطاقوي في بحر قزوين، دراسة في التنافس الدولي على خطوط نقل الطاقة - رسالة ماجستير، قالمة، جامعة 8 مايو 1945.
3. حميد محمد، 2019، "جمهوريات آسيا الوسطى بين التنافس الإقليمي والدولي بعد تفكك الاتحاد السوفياتي 1991،" مجلة كلية القانون للعلوم القانونية والسياسية".
4. رفـعـت حسيـن، 2021، "بلدان آسيا الوسطى المنسية عربيا مثلث النفوذ الإيراني - التركي -الإسرائيلي،" الشؤون العربية الاوراسية، "مركز الدراسات العربية الاوراسية،" مجلة الشؤون العربية الأوراسية.
5. شوبهدا تشودري، 2024، "موازنات براغماتية، إدارة التحالفات الجيوسياسية الجديدة في آسيا الوسطى 2024،" ملفات المستقبل.
6. غدي قنديل، 2022، "التنافــس التركـــي-الايرانـــي فـي آسيا الوسطـــى،" مجلة الدراسات الإيرانية.
7. محمود حيدر، 2014، "جيوبوليتيك الحافة، في الصراع المستحدث على آسيا الوسطى بين روسيا وتركيا،" مجلة حمورابي.
المراجع الأجنبية والمواقع الالكترونية:
1. Alexandra Eleferenko,2026, The Middle Corridor: an alternative for Europe and Asia, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390583204_The_Middle_Corridor_an_alternative_for_Europe_and_Asia
2. Alrmizan, 2022, "Turkish Foreign Policy in Central Asia in the Era of Erdoğan: The Convergence of Pan-Turkism, Pragmatism, and Islamism," Dirasat- King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies.
3. Centre, International Trade. 2025. Bilateral trade . -20257 -20. https://www.trademap.org/Bilateral_TS.aspx?nvpm=1%7c842%7c%7c%7c23%7cTOTAL%7c%7c%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c3%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c1%7c1%7c1Mohammed
4. https://www.noonpost.com/221078/
5. Nurlan Nurseiit,2025, Attractiveness and Prospects of the Middle Corridor for Cargo Transportation Between Europe and Asia, Journal of Eurasian Studies, Vol. 0(0) 1–16, p 168-182, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396672980_Attractiveness_and_Prospects_of_the_Middle_Corridor_for_Cargo_Transportation_Between_Europe_and_Asia
6. Tuba Eldem, 2022, Russia’s War on Ukraine and the Rise of the Middle Corridor as a Third Vector of Eurasian Connectivity, Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
7. World Bank. 2023. MIDDLE TRADE AND TRANSPORT CORRIDOR POLICIES AND INVESTMENTS TO TRIPLE FREIGHT VOLUMES AND HALVE TRAVEL TIME BY 2030. Washington, DC: World Bank.